Use canonical link for all RFC references #241
Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
|
@HamdaanAliQuatil |
|
PR #246 suggests this PR should not be landed. I haven't reviewed any of it yet, but PR for a PR that hasn't landed suggests we should land this. |
|
@jonasfj @HamdaanAliQuatil |
|
Hey @YATIN072007 - looks like this PR has some bleed-through from #243. I’m seeing changes related to making examples self-contained/runnable, which isn’t part of this issue. Could you split those into a PR #243 and revert them here so we can land this one quickly? |
YATIN072007
force-pushed
the
issue-189-rfc-links
branch
2 times, most recently
from
cffc081 to
2fa2077
Compare
YATIN072007
changed the title
3 participants
Closes #189
Updating all RFC references in the modified files to use a single, canonical source. All RFC links now point to their canonical URLs, which improves consistency and avoids redirects or unofficial mirrors.